These are archived updates regarding the trial
proceedings, Kifle's health, and spirit
November 26, 2006
In 17 days, Kifle will have been held illegally for 1 year. At no time
has any concrete evidence been brought against him to substantiate the unbelievable
charges of “outrages against the constitution” and “attempted
genocide”.
November 22, 2006
On October 31st, after ten and a half months in detention, Kifle
and 30 other defendants were herded into the small High Court
room on. They listened on the first day of their trial
as obviously coached witnesses were brought in.
November 2, 2006
Kifle's trial started on Tuesday October 31st. Over 2 days, eleven
witnesses gave their evidence.
October 30, 2006
Bail denied - The Supreme Court today denied bail for Kifle
and co- defendants despite the lack of evidence to date and
the solid argument presented by the defense. The trial is
due to start tomorrow, October 31st when witness statements will
be heard.
October 26, 2006
Kifle remains in the police Hospital where he is getting
treatment and making good progress. The trial is now due to start
on October 31st.
October 12, 2006
Kifle's trial was delayed for a further 19 days today as
he has been admitted to the police hospital for a minor skin
infection.
August 3, 2006
After continuous delays, Kifle and the other 29 defendants were again brought
to the Supreme Court on Wednesday August 2nd - this time to hear the decision
of the judges as to the long pending bail appeal (filed in April 2006).
June 23, 2006
At the last court appearance, the judge ruled in favour of the defence lawyer's
request to provide specificity to the charges for all defendants.
June 11, 2006
On April 12, an appeal to the
rejection of the bail application was submitted to the Supreme
Court. As on June 8th, there has been no ruling on this with repeated
delays associated with the loss of the documents and other
excuses.
March 20, 2006
Kifle stated that they had only received the charges the Friday evening prior
to the court hearing on Monday March 20 and therefore had been unable to review
and take legal counsel and requested an adjournment. |